Grantee Publication

Group Health Cooperative's Transformation Toward Patient-Centered Access

Medical Care Research and Review
Vol. 66, No. 6
June 23, 2009
Ralston, J.D., Martin, D.P., Anderson, M.L., Fishman, P.A., Conrad, D.A., Larson, E.B., and D. Grembowski
pp. 703-24

The Institute of Medicine suggests redesigning health care to ensure safe, effective, timely, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care. The concept of patient-centered access supports these goals.

Nothing for Something? Estimating Cost and Value for Beneficiaries from Recent Medicare Spending Increases on HMO Payments and Drug Benefits

International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics
Vol. 9, No. 1
March 2009
Pizer, S.D., Frakt, A.B., and R. Feldman
pp. 59-81

The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 added a new outpatientprescription drug benefit to Medicare and increased payments to HMOs. We estimate a nested logit model of plan choice to quantify the welfare benefits from these two expansion paths. We find that the addition of stand-alone prescription drug plans was welfare improving and produced nine times as much value per government dollar as the increase in payments to HMOs. In light of these results, we suggest that HMO bidding procedures should be modified to reduce payments to HMOs by about $67 billion over the next 10 years.

Payment Reduction and Medicare Private Fee-for-Service Plans

Health Care Financing Review
Vol. 30, No. 3
Spring 2009
Frakt, A.B., Pizer, S.D., and R. Feldman
pp. 15-24

Medicare private fee-for-service (PFFS) plans are paid like other Medicare Advantage (MA) plans but are exempt from many MA requirements. Recently, Congress set average payments well above the costs of traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare, inducing dramatic increases in PFFS plan enrollment. This has significant implications for Medicare's budget, provoking calls for policy change. We predict the effect of proposals to cut PFFS payments on PFFS plan participation and enrollment.

What Does it Cost Physician Practices to Interact with Health Insurance Plans?

Health Affairs
Vol. 28, No 4
May 14, 2009
Casalino, L.P., Nicholson, S., Gans, D.N., Hammons, T., Morra, D., Karrison, T., and W. Levinson
pp. 533-43

Physicians have long expressed dissatisfaction with the time they and their staffs spend interacting with health plans. However, little information exists about the extent of these interactions. We conducted a national survey on this subject of physicians and practice administrators. Physicians reported spending three hours weekly interacting with plans; nursing and clerical staff spent much larger amounts of time. When time is converted to dollars, we estimate that the national time cost to practices of interactions with plans is at least $23 billion to $31 billion each year.

Employee Choice of Consumer-Driven Health Insurance in a Multiplan, Multiproduct Setting

Health Services Research--August 2004
Vol. 39, No. 4, Pt. 2
August 2004
Parente, S., Feldman, R., and J. Christianson
pp. 1091-112

Objective: To compare medical care costs and utilization in a consumer-driven health plan (CDHP) to other health insurance plans.

Health Maintenance Organization Penetration and the Practice Location Choices of New Physicians: A Study of Large Metropolitan Areas in the United States

Medical Care
Vol. 36, No. 11
November 1998
Escarce, J., Polsky, D., Wozniak, G., Pauly, M.V., and P.R. Kletke
pp. 1555-66

OBJECTIVES: The rapid growth of health maintenance organizations is reshaping the practice opportunities available to physicians. The practice location decisions of new physicians provide a sensitive bellwether of these changes. This study assessed the effect of health maintenance organization penetration on practice location for physicians completing graduate medical education (GME). METHODS: Conditional logit regression analysis was used to determine the effect of health maintenance organization penetration on practice location, controlling for other market characteristics.

The Structure and Enforcement of Health Insurance Rating Reforms

Inquiry
Vol. 37, No. 4
Winter 2001
Hall, M.
pp. 376-88

Requiring health insurers to cover everyone who applies regardless of health status--an approach called "guaranteed issue"--is severely hampered without accompanying rating restrictions that keep insurance affordable for higher-risk people. The degree of rating flexibility also determines how much insurers can continue to compete based on their skills at risk selection, and how well they can counter adverse selection. Therefore, the structure and enforcement of rating reforms are essential to how insurance market reforms function.

The Questionable Value of Medical Screening in the Small-Group Health Insurance Market

Health Affairs
Vol. 14, No. 2
June 1995
Glazner, J., Braithwaite, W.R., Hull, S., and C. Lezotte
pp. 224-34

Insurers perform medical screening to assess risk for health insurance in the small-group market. Most reform proposals eliminate screening because it denies coverage to those who need it. This DataWatch empirically analyzes the value of medical screening to insurers. We analyzed claims of two employed populations covered by a large insurer--one screened and the other not screened. We found no significant difference in the amounts claimed by these two populations over six years.

Topic: 
Access

Factors that Enhance Continued Trauma Center Participation in Trauma Systems

Journal of Trauma
Vol. 41, No. 5
November 1996
Bazzoli, G.J., Meersman, P.J., and C. Chan
pp. 876-85

OBJECTIVES: To examine hospital, trauma system, and reimbursement factors that offset the financial burdens of trauma care delivery and to assess how proposed Medicaid and Medicare budget cuts may affect the ability of hospitals to alleviate financial pressures related to trauma care delivery. DESIGN AND SETTING: In-depth interviews and data collection for trauma centers in 12 metropolitan areas with populations of 1 million or more.

Consumer Directed Health Plans and the Chronically Ill

Disease Management & Health Outcomes
Vol. 15, No. 4
2007
Parente, S.T., Christianson, J.B., and R. Feldman
pp. 239-48(10)

Background: The appropriateness of new consumer-directed health plan (CDHP) benefit designs for people with chronic illnesses has been questioned, but little information exists regarding the experience of chronically ill individuals in CDHPs. To contribute to a better understanding of the experience of people with chronic illnesses in CDHPs, this study analyzed survey and medical claims data from a large public employer that offered a CDHP as well as other benefit options.

Syndicate content